Ballard Power Systems Inc.

Sound bite for Twitter and StockTwits is: Industrial Tech Stock. This is listed as an industrial stock, but it is really a tech stock. It has always operated on a hope and a dream. Today is no different. At the time I bought it, it was the next big thing that did not work out. However, relatively speaking it does seem expensive. See my spreadsheet on Ballard Power Systems Inc. .

I do not own this stock of Ballard Power Systems Inc. (TSX-BLDP, NASDAQ-BLDP), but I used to. Back in 1997, I read about Ballard and fell in love with the idea of cars running with fuel cells. I could help save the environment and also make some money. It was very attractive. I sold this stock in 2006 because it had lost its attraction. It did not seem that Ballard fuel cells would be in any car anytime soon. I was ahead in 2000, but the stock started to fall in October 2000 and never recovered.

When I was updating my spreadsheet, I noticed that this company still is not earning any profit. Analysts keep putting off when the first positive earnings will appear.

This stock pays not dividends and it never has.

All the debt ratios for this company are good. The Long Term Debt/Market Cap Ratio is very low at 0.01. The Liquidity Ratio for 2017 is 2.61 with 5 year median of 2.50. The Debt Ratio for 2017 is 3.28 with 5 year median of 2.96. These last two ratios are good if 1.50 or higher. The Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios are good at 1.44 and 0.47. (These ratios are the same in either currency.)

The Total Return per year is show below for years of 5 to 22. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See charts below.

It looks like this stock is currently earning some capital gains for the shareholders. For long term holders there is not happy story yet.

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	0.00%	55.58%	55.58%	0.00%
10	0.00%	0.48%	0.48%	0.00%
15	0.00%	-7.09%	-7.09%	0.00%
20	0.00%	-8.96%	-8.96%	0.00%
22	0.00%	0.48%	0.48%	0.00%

The 5 year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are -9.22, -18.87 and -29.90. The historical P/E Ratios are -8.91, 13.81 and 18.39. the current P/E Ratio is -34.45 CDN$ based on a stock price of $4.05 CDN$ and 2018 EPS estimate of $-$0.12 CDN$ (-$0.09 US$). You cannot do this test with negative P/E Ratios.

I get a Graham Price of $0.71 CDN$. The 10 year low, median, and high median Price/Graham Price Ratios are 0.32, 0.90 and 0.59 CDN$. The current P/GP Ratio is 5.67 CDN$ based on a stock price of $4.05 CDN$. Since there are lots of earning losses this is not a good test for this stock. However, this test does suggest that the stock price is relatively expensive.

I get a 10 year median Price/Book Value per Share Ratio of 1.88 US$. The current P/B Ratio is 4.66 US$ based on Book Value of $118.73, Book Value per Share of |$0.66 US$ and a stock price of $3.10 US$. The current P/B Ratio is some 148% above the 10 year median ratio. This test does suggest that the stock price is relatively expensive.

The 10 year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 3.06 US$. The current P/S Ratio is 4.86 US$ based on 2018 Revenue estimate of $114 US$, Revenue per Share of $0.64 US$ and a stock price of $3.10 US$. The current P/S Ratio is some 59% higher than the 10 year ratio. This test does suggest that the stock price is relatively expensive.

When I look at analysts’ recommendations I find Buy (1) and Hold (2). The consensus recommendation would be a Hold. The 12 month price consensus is $3.11 CDN$ ($2.38 US$). This implies a total loss of 23.24% all of which is a capital loss.

Jayson Maclean on Can Tech thinks that Ballard should pivot to ships. In this article the company on News Wire talk about acquiring assets from AFCC. Peter Kolinski on What’s on Thorold talks about recent analysts recommendations on this stock. Maxx Chatsko of Motley Fool does not believe in this stock. Analysts on Stock Chase are not impressed with this stock either.

Ballard Power Systems Inc is engaged in the design, development, manufacture, sale, and service of proton exchange membrane fuel cell products for a variety of applications, focusing on commercial stage and development stage markets. Its web site is here Ballard Power Systems Inc.

The last stock I wrote about was about was Savaria Corporation (TSX-SIS, OTC-SISXF) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be Loblaw Companies Ltd. (TSX-L, OTC-LBLCF) ... learn more on Tuesday, August 07, 2018 around 5 pm.

This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.

See my website for stocks followed and investment notes. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter or StockTwits. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.

Savaria Corporation

Sound bite for Twitter and StockTwits is: Dividend Growth Consumer. This stock is showing as relatively expensive consistently on all my stock price tests. It is a good company, but I believe the price is just too high. See my spreadsheet on Savaria Corporation.

I do not own this stock of Savaria Corporation (TSX-SIS, OTC-SISXF). I got this stock off the Dividend Blogger site that no longer exists. I am always interested in dividend growth small cap stock. The first few years of accounting were rather confusing, but I think I figured them out in the end.

When I was updating my spreadsheet, I noticed is that the company has done well for shareholders, especially lately as you can see from the chart below. Another thing that there has been increases in the number of outstanding shares, especially over the past 5 years. The outstanding shares have increased by 12.5% and 4% per year over the past 5 and 10 years.

Dividends are moderate with good growth. The current dividend yield is 2.17%, with 5, 10 and historical yields at 3.30%, 3.89% and 3.70%. The dividend growth is at 25%, 13% and 22% per year over the past 5, 10 and 12 years. However, there were years when dividends were cut as well as increased. Overall dividends have increased. Dividends were started in 2004.

The Dividend Payout Ratio for 2017 is 60.6% with 5 year coverage of 67%. The Dividend Payout Ratios have been too high in the past. The most recent ones are fine with the 5 year coverage a bit high but this was due to 2014 when there was a big dividend increase, but not a big EPS increase.

All the Debt Ratios are good. The Long Term Debt to Market Cap is 0.05 which is very low. The Liquidity Ratio for 2017 is 2.42 with 5 year median at 2.49. The Debt Ratio for 2017 is 2.71 with 5 year median at 2.06. I like these at 1.50 or above. The Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios are also quite good at 1.58 and 0.58 respectively with 5 year medians of 2.03 and 1.03 respectively. This is a small cap stock and it is important to have good debt ratios when you are a small cap.

The Total Return per year is show below for years of 5 to 16. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See charts below.

Shareholders have recently done very well on this stock in both capital gains and dividend growth. The stock has gone down a bit this year. However, the TSX has not done well overall either.

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	24.84%	69.25%	63.49%	5.77%
10	13.27%	34.45%	31.26%	3.18%
15	22.48%	13.22%	12.18%	1.04%
16		22.25%	20.68%	1.57%

The 5 year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are 14.26, 18.41 and 22.18. The corresponding 10 year ratios are 13.65, 16.57 and 20.38. The historical ratios are 13.70, 17.41 and 20.88. The current P/E Ratio is 28.57 based on a stock price of $16.57 and 2018 EPS estimate of $0.58. This stock price testing suggests that the stock is relatively expensive.

I get a Graham Price of $6.66. The 10 year low, median, and high median Price/Graham Price Ratios are 0.95, 1.17 and 1.42. The current P/GP Ratio is 2.49 based on a stock price of $16.57. This stock price testing suggests that the stock is relatively expensive.

I get a 10 year median Price/Book Value per Share Ratio of 2.13. The current P/B Ratio is 4.87 based on Book Value of $140M, Book Value per Share of $3.40 and a stock price of $16.57. The current P/B Ratio is some 129% above the 10 year median. This stock price testing suggests that the stock is relatively expensive.

I get an historical median dividend yield of 3.70%. The current dividend yield is 2.17% based on dividends of $3.60 and a stock price of $16.57. The current yield is some 41% below the historical dividend yield. This stock price testing suggests that the stock is relatively expensive.

The 10 year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 0.67. The current P/S Ratio is 2.43 based on 2018 Revenue estimate of $281, Revenue per Share of 6.81 and a stock price of $16.57. The current P/S Ratio is some 203% above the 10 year median P/S Ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock is relatively expensive.

When I look at analysts’ recommendations I find Strong Buy (1) and Buy (5). The consensus would be a Buy. The 12 month stock price is $20.67. This implies a total return of 26.92% with 24.74% from capital gains and 2.17% from dividends based on a current stock price of $16.57.

The company in this article on Globe News Wire talks about their acquisition of a lift company. Daisy Mock on Simply Wall Street says this stock has an intrinsic value of $10.12 so it is currently overvalued. Joey Frenette on Motley Fool thinks that the stock is overpriced. See what analysts are saying on Stock Chase. A number of analysts like this company.

Savaria Corp designs, engineers, and manufactures products for personal mobility of the people. Its products are home elevators, wheelchair lifts, commercial elevators, ceiling lift, stair lift, van conversions and others. Its web site is here Savaria Corporation.

The last stock I wrote about was about was TECSYS Inc. (TSX-TCS, OTC-TCYSF) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be Ballard Power Systems Inc. (TSX-BLDP, NASDAQ-BLDP) ... learn more on Friday, August 3, 2018 around 5 pm. Tomorrow on my other blog I will write about Enbridge.... learn more on Thursday, August 20, 2018 around 5 pm.

This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.

See my website for stocks followed and investment notes. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter or StockTwits. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.

TECSYS Inc.

Sound bite for Twitter and StockTwits is: Dividend growth industrial. This stock could also be considered a Tech stock. It is also rather small. From my stock price testing I think it is expensive. I will not be selling this just because it is overpriced, but I will not buy anymore currently. See my spreadsheet on TECSYS Inc.

I own this stock of TECSYS Inc. (TSX-TCS, OTC-TCYSF). I came across this stock when I was looking for a dividend paying small cap stock as a filler stock. I consider a filler stock to be one to soak up small amounts of investment money that I have left over in my account, especially in the TFSA after I have made my main purchase for the year.

When I was updating my spreadsheet, I noticed that if I had bought more than a few shares in this company I could have made a lot more money. The other thing is that there has been lots of insider selling over the past few years. This is a small company so selling by insiders would affect the Selling/Market Cap Percentage. However, this percentage has been high at 1.36%, 0.51% and 0.90%.

A problem is that people can sell for all sorts of reasons, but it is only buying that gives a positive reason because people buy shares in their companies because they feel good about its future. However, looking closer, I find that the Chairman has reduced his shares by 36% over the past 5 years. He is the founder of this company. He and the CEO are brothers. Over the same time period the CEO has reduced his shares by 18%.

They could be selling because they simply need money. Another reason is that they are trying to diversify their investment holdings and not have all their money tied up in one company. Founders of companies are often advised to do this and have a regular selling program.

The dividend yield is low and the dividend growth is good. The current dividend yield is 1.20% with 5, 10 and historical yields at 1.24%, 2.00% and 2.00%. Dividends have only been paid for the past 10 years. Dividends have grown by 21.5% and 16.6% per year over the past 5 and 10 years.

They can afford their dividends. The Dividend Payout Ratio varies from year to year quite a bit because earnings are volatile. The DPR for 2018 was 61.7% with 5 year coverage at 39.5%. In this case the 5 year coverage is probably the important one. The DPR for CFPS for 2018 was 47% with 5 year coverage at 28.8%.

Their long term debt is negligible. The Long Term Debt/Market Cap Ratio is 0.00. All the debt ratios are good. The Liquidity Ratio is 1.76 with 5 year median at 1.61. The Debt Ratio for 2018 is 3.13 with 5 year median at 2.09. The Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios for 2018 are 1.47 and 0.47 respectively, with 5 year medians at 1.91 and 0.91, respectively. Note that the financial year ends in April each year so I am looking at the financial year ending in April 2018.

The Total Return per year is show below for years of 5 to 19. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See charts below.

It is interesting that the stock currently has a higher return in more recent years than in the longer term.

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	21.45%	38.52%	36.82%	1.71%
10	16.55%	27.82%	26.10%	1.72%
15		19.86%	18.97%	0.90%
19		9.54%	9.11%	0.42%

The 5 year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are 21.69, 29.91 and 38.13. The 10 year corresponding ratios are 18.17, 22.62 and 27.07. The historical ratios are 11.24, 13.54 and 16.46. The rising P/E Ratio rise shows that the stock price is rising faster than earnings. The current P/E Ratio is 32.12 based on a stock price of $16.70 and 2019 EPS of $0.52. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

I get a Graham Price of $6.21. The 10 year low, median, and high median Price/Graham Price Ratios are 1.40, 1.83 and 2.21. The current P/GP Ratio is 2.69 based on a stock price of $16.70. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

I get a 10 year median Price/Book Value per Share Ratio of 2.74. The current P/B Ratio is 5.06 based on a stock price of $16.70, Book Value of $43M and Book Value per Share of $3.30. The current ratio is some 855 higher than the 10 year median ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

I get an historical median dividend yield of 2.00%. The current yield is 1.20% based on dividends of $0.20 and a stock price of $16.70. The current yield is some 40% lower than the historical median. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

The 10 year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 0.97. The current P/S Ratio is 2.74 based on 2019 Revenue estimate of $79.7M, Revenue per Share of $6.09 and a stock price of $16.70. The current ratio is some 183% above the 10 year median ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

When I look at analysts’ recommendations I find Buy (5) and Hold (1). The consensus would be a Buy. The 12 month stock price is $18.10. this implies a total return of 9.58% with 8.38% from capital gains and 1.20% from dividends.

The company talks about its fourth quarterly results on Globe News Wire. Kevin Zeng on Simply Wall Street says that this company has a good historical track record. See what analysts are saying about this stock on Stock Chase. the company is not well covered but it is liked and several analysts have named it their top pick over the years.

Tecsys Inc is a provider of supply chain solutions. The company's solution is built on supply chain platform, and includes warehouse management, distribution management, transportation management, and others. Its web site is here TECSYS Inc.

The last stock I wrote about was about was Pulse Seismic Inc. (TSX-PSD, OTC- PLSDF) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be Savaria Corporation (TSX-SIS, OTC-SISXF) ... learn more on Wednesday, August 1, 2018 around 5 pm. Tomorrow on my other blog I will write about Enbridge.... learn more on Tuesday, July 31, 2018 around 5 pm.

This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.

See my website for stocks followed and investment notes. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter or StockTwits. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.

Pulse Seismic Inc

Sound bite for Twitter and StockTwits is: Dividend Paying Industrial. I list it as a dividend paying stock as they have not given up on dividend as evidenced by their recent special dividend. It just maybe a bit pricey for what you get in risks. The lack of debt makes this stock less risky. See my spreadsheet on Pulse Seismic Inc.

I do not own this stock of Pulse Seismic Inc. (TSX-PSD, OTC-PLSDF). I wanted to invest some extra money in a dividend paying small cap. I went to the Globe and Mail site of G&M and from Globe Investor section I selected the Stock Filter. I asked for companies that were priced between $1 and $5.50 and had a yield between 4% and 20%. Pulse Seismic Inc. was one of the companies that were returned. This is not a stock I chose to invest in but I found it of interest so I am following it.

When I was updating my spreadsheet, I noticed a lot of red for Revenue, Earnings and Cash Flow. They also discontinued their quarterly dividend in 2017. The Market seems to expect a recovery because the stock price rose in 2016 and 2017. However, it went down again in 2018, but then the TSX has not done a lot this year.

They did cut their regular dividends in 2017. However, in 2017 they gave a special dividend of $0.20 a share. The company talks about giving a special dividend in 2017 on Globe News Wire due to their strong cash position.

They could not afford their dividends as they were not being covered by earnings. This is probably why they were cut.

The company has no long term debt. They Liquidity Ratio for 2017 was 3.09 with a 5 year median of 3.71. The Debt Ratio for 2017 is 3.72 with5 year median of 4.42. The Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios for 2017 was 1.37 and 0.37 respectively with 5 year median of 1.52 and 0.52 respectively. They have very good debt ratios.

The Total Return per year is show below for years of 5 to 19. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See charts below.

They have not done well recently for their shareholders. Since they have cut dividends the only return now is capital gain and that has not been very high in the last 5 and 10 years.

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	0.00%	6.08%	3.24%	2.84%
10	0.00%	4.13%	1.68%	2.45%
15	0.00%	11.60%	6.85%	4.74%
19		16.30%	11.19%	5.11%

The 5 year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are -8.42, -12.03 and -15.65. The corresponding 10 year ratios are -2.33, -3.49 and -4.64. The historical ratios are 3.59, 5.06 and 6.36. The current P/E Ratio is 19.77 based on a stock price of $2.57 and 2018 EPS estimate of $0.13. It is obvious that we can do not testing again past ratios as there is too many years with negative earnings. On an absolute basis, a P/E Ratio is 19.77 does not point to a cheap price. A Ratio of 19.77 might point to a reasonable price.

I get a Graham Price of $1.38. The 10 year low, median, and high median Price/Graham Price Ratios are 1.97, 2.50 and 2.94. The current P/GP Ratio is 1.86 based on a stock price of $2.57. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively cheap. There is that same problem with too many EPS losses.

I get a 10 year median Price/Book Value per Share Ratio of $2.51. The current P/B Ratio is 3.92 based on a Book Value of $33.3M, Book Value per Share of $0.66 and a stock price of $2.57. The current ratio is some 565 higher than the 10 year median ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

I get an historical median dividend yield of 2.26%. There is no current yield as the company cancelled the dividends. Therefore, we cannot do any stock price testing based on dividend yield.

The 10 year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 3.22. The current P/S Ratio is 6.92 based on 2018 Revenue estimate of $20M, Revenue per Share of $0.37 and a stock price of $2.57. The current P/S ratio is some 115% higher than the 10 year ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

When I look at analysts’ recommendations I find one Buy recommendation. This is a small stock so it is not well covered. The 12 months stock price given is $3.30. This implies a total return of 28.40% all from capital gains based on a currently stock price of $2.57.

The company put out a new release for their second quarter of 2018 on Globe News Wire. Ambrose O'Callaghan on Motley Fool expects this stock to do well in the future. See what analysts are saying about this stock on Stock Chase. This is not a well-covered stock and the trading volumes are small.

Pulse Seismic Inc acts as a provider of seismic data to the energy sector in western Canada. It is engaged in the acquisition, marketing, and licensing of 2D and 3D seismic data to the energy sector. Its web site is here Pulse Seismic Inc.

The last stock I wrote about was about was Dorel Industries Inc. (TSX-DII.B, OTC-DIIBF) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be TECSYS Inc. (TSX-TCS, OTC-TCYSF) ... learn more on Monday, July 30, 2018 around 5 pm.

This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.

See my website for stocks followed and investment notes. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter or StockTwits. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.

Dorel Industries Inc

Sound bite for Twitter and StockTwits is: Dividend Paying Consumer. Stock seems cheap, but it also is cheap for a reason. Their profit is going down. See my spreadsheet on Dorel Industries Inc.

I do not own this stock of Dorel Industries Inc. (TSX-DII.B, OTC-DIIBF), but I used to. This was a stock recommended by Investment Reporter as a conservative investment. I sold the stock in 2006 because I had it for 7 years from 1999 and it was going nowhere. I bought this stock before I stopped working and at that time I did not mind buying stocks with no dividends. It started dividends in 2007, just after I sold.

When I was updating my spreadsheet, I noticed that the current Long Term Debt/Market Cap ratio is 1.00 in US$. This means that the Long Term Debt equals the market cap. This is not a good sign. The Long Term Debt after fall for a couple of years increased in 2017 by 22%. The Long Term Debt/Market Cap for 2017 was only 0.69. Since then the stock price has fallen. This is a vulnerability.

Dividends are paid in US$ which they started to pay in 2007. There were some good increases early on, but dividends have been flat since 2013. As the company has been doing poorly and the stock price has been dropping the yield is gone up. The historical median is 2.86% US$. The current yield is 6.43% US$.

Analysts do not think that the dividend is at risk, but they have not been able to afford it since 2014. The current Dividend Payout Ratio for EPS for 2017 is 143% with 5 year coverage at 250%. If the percentage is over 100% it means that they are paying out more than the earnings. What saves the dividend is that the DPR for CFPS is good with the 2017 ratio at 24% with 5 year coverage also at 24%.

As I mentioned above, the Long Term Debt/Market Cap is above 1.00 in US$. This is never a good sign. However, the other debt ratios are fine. The Liquidity Ratio for 2017 is 1.91 with 5 year median at 1.88. The Debt Ratio for 2017 is 1.96 with 5 year median at 1.95. For these ratios I like them at 1.50 or above. The Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios at 2.04 and 1.04 are typical for a consumer stock.

The Total Return per year is show below for years of 5 to 25 in CDN$ and 5 to 10 in US$. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See charts below.

This is the CDN$ chart. The only acceptable return is the 25 year return. This company has not been making money for the shareholders for a long time.

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	10.95%	1.68%	-2.68%	4.36%
10	11.79%	3.80%	0.46%	3.34%
15		1.35%	-0.77%	2.12%
20		4.81%	2.96%	1.84%
25		8.98%	7.22%	1.76%

This is the US$ chart. I did not calculate longer terms in US$, but the company has not done well in US$ term either as shown by this chart.

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	5.92%	-3.31%	-7.22%	3.91%
10	9.15%	1.12%	-2.13%	3.25%

The 5 year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are 17.33, 20.34 and 23.35 CDN$. The corresponding 10 year ratios are 7.00, 8.77 and 10.41 CDN$. The historical corresponding ratios are 9.31, 12.16 and 14.80 CDN$. P/E Ratios often go up when a stock’s price goes down because the stock price does not always fall as fast as the EPS. The current P/E Ratio is 12.39 CDN$ based on a stock price of $24.76 CDN$ and 2018 EPS estimate of $2.00 CDN$ or $1.52 US$. This is probably not a good test for this stock. However, this stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable.

I get a Graham Price of $44.70 CDN$. The 10 year low, median, and high median Price/Graham Price Ratios are 0.64, 0.73 and 0.73 CDN$. The current P/GP Ratio is 0.55 CDN$ based on a stock price of $24.76 CDN$. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively cheap.

I get a 10 year median Price/Book Value per Share of Ratio 0.76 CDN$. The current P/B Ratio is 0.56 CDN$ based on Book Value of $1,442M CDN$, Book Value per Share of $44.45 CDN$ and a stock price of $24.76 CDN$. The current ratio is some 27% below the 10 year median ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively cheap.

I get an historical median dividend yield of 2.64% CDN$. The current dividend yield is 6.37% CDN$ based on dividends of $1.58 CDN$ ($1.20 US$) and a stock price of $24.76 CDN$. The current yield is some 141% above the historical dividend yield. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively cheap.

The 10 year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 0.36 US$. The current P/S Ratio is 0.23 US$ based on a stock price of $18.66 US$, Revenue estimate for 2018 of $2,615 US$ and Revenue per Share of $80.61 US$. The current P/S Ratio is some 36% below the 10 year median P/S Ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively cheap.

When I look at analysts’ recommendations I find Hold (4) and Sell (1) recommendations. The consensus recommendation would be a Hold. The 12 month stock price consensus is $20.93 US or $27.55 CDN$. This implies a total return of 17.62% with 11.25% from capital gains and 6.37% from dividends CDN$.

The company on Globe News Wire announced sale of their apparent lines of SUGOI and Sombrio brands. Alex Johannesen on Simply Wall Street looks at debt levels and finds them acceptable. Will Ashworth of Motley Fool thinks it is a value play but risky. See what analysts say on Stock Chase. Most recent recommendations are “Don’t Buy”.

Dorel Industries Inc is a consumer products company. It designs, manufactures or sources, markets, and distributes a portfolio of product brands, marketed through Dorel Juvenile, Dorel Sports and Dorel Home segments. Its web site is here Dorel Industries Inc.

The last stock I wrote about was about was Obsidian Energy Ltd TSX-OBE, NYSE-OBE) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be Pulse Seismic Inc. (TSX-PSD, OTC- PLSDF) ... learn more on Friday, July 27, 2018 around 5 pm. Tomorrow on my other blog I will write about TSX Underperforming.... learn more on Thursday, July 26, 2018 around 5 pm.

This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.

See my website for stocks followed and investment notes. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter or StockTwits. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.

Obsidian Energy Ltd

Sound bite for Twitter and StockTwits is: Cheap Resource Stock. From my stock price testing it looks like the current stock price runs from very cheap to reasonable. Any time a stock is very cheap, there is also lots of risk involved in holding the stock. On the other hand, there is lots of insider buying. See my spreadsheet on Obsidian Energy Ltd.

I do not own this stock of Obsidian Energy Ltd (TSX-OBE, NYSE-OBE) but I used to. I bought this stock as Maximum Energy Trust (MXT.UN) in 1998. In November 2001, there was a stock exchange and the stock became Ultimate Energy Fund. In June 2004 fund changed from Ultimate Energy Income Trust to Petrofund Energy. Petrofund Energy merged with Penn West in July 2006.

When I was updating my spreadsheet, I noticed that they had a new Chairman and also the other two directors I was following had also left. There is a lot of insider buying in the past year just as there was last year. In the past year Net Insider Buying was 0.26% of Market Cap and in the prior year it was 0.30%. You expect NIB to be around 0.01% to 0.02% of Market Cap.

I see a lot of red ink on my spreadsheets. This includes everything like Revenue, EPS, Cash Flow, Book Value, and stock value. This means that flows are lower or non-existent. They have also stopped their dividends. The last time a dividend was paid was in 2015. Analysts do not expect them to have earnings anytime soon, so there will not be any dividends anytime soon.

The Debt Ratio I do not like is the Liquidity Ratio. For 2017 it was 0.66. This means that current assets cannot cover current liabilities. Only if you include cash flow after dividends and current portion of long term debt does the ratio rise above 1.00 to a still low ratio of 1.32. So, to pay for current liabilities they must count on cash flow and rolling over of debt. This could be a problem in a recession.

The Long Term Debt/Market Cap Ratio is good at 0.42. The Debt Ratio is very good at 3.57 with 5 year coverage at 2.56. The Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios are also quite good at 1.39 and 0.39 for 2017. The 5 year ratios are also good at 1.68 and 0.68.

The Total Return per year is show below for years of 5 to 22. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See charts below.

As you can see from the chart below, investors have not made money recently and only made money in the past due to the dividends.

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	0.00%	-27.42%	-31.78%	4.37%
10	0.00%	-20.51%	-27.77%	7.26%
15	0.00%	-2.40%	-15.07%	12.67%
20	0.00%	15.98%	-14.47%	30.45%
22	0.00%	8.91%	-13.25%	22.16%

The 5 year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are –0.66, -1.87 and -3.09. The corresponding 10 year ratios are -0.33, -0.78 and -1.81. The historical ratios are 6.14, 9.56 and 13.06. The only reasonable ones are the historical ratios. The current P/E Ratio is -5.04 based on a stock price of $1.36 and 2018 EPS estimate of -$0.27. You can not do any P/E Ratio testing with negative values.

I get a Graham Price of $5.89. The 10 year low, median, and high median Price/Graham Price Ratios are 0.46. 0.78 and 1.14. The current P/GP Ratio is 0.23 based on a stock price of $1.36. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively cheap. This is not a good test because of earning losses.

I get a 10 year median Price/Book Value per Share Ratio of 0.74. The current P/B Ratio is 0.33 based on a stock price of $1.36, Book Value of $2,102M and Book Value per Share of $4.16. The current P/B Ratio is some 56% below the 10 year median ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively cheap. A stock is always considered cheap if it is selling below book value or a ratio below 1.00.

The problem with the book value is that it is sinking fast. The book value has declined by 25% and 14% per year over the past 5 and 10 years. The decline is slowing as the book value per share only declined by 4% in 2017 and so far this year by 3%.

I get an historical median dividend yield of 10.27%. This yield is very high because the stock used to be an income trust company. However, until they cut the dividends, the yield was still quite high. I cannot do a stock price test because the company currently has no dividends.

The 10 year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 1.67. The current P/S Ratio is 1.62 based on 2018 Revenue estimate of $425M, Revenue per Share of $0.84 and a stock price of $1.36. The current P/S Ratio is some 3% below the 10 year ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

When I look at analysts’ recommendations I find Strong Buy (1), Buy (4), Hold (5) and Underperform (3). The consensus would be a Hold. The 12 month stock price is $1.94. This implies a total return of 42.65% all from capital gains.

Yolanda Lovett on Simply Wall Street worry about some debt ratios. Troy Warner on MTL News Journal says this company has a Piotroski F-Score of 0.8 where a low score show a weak balance sheet. Matthew DiLallo on Motley Fool talks about this company selling some assets. See what analysts are saying on Stock Chase about this company. They are mostly negative about activist investors.

Obsidian Energy Ltd is an independent Canadian energy company focused on the exploration and production of oil and natural gas resources in Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia. Its web site is here Obsidian Energy Ltd .

The last stock I wrote about was about was Atlantic Power Corp (TSX-ATP, NYSE-AT) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be Dorel Industries Inc. (TSX-DII.B, OTC-DIIBF) ... learn more on Wednesday, July 25, 2018 around 5 pm. Tomorrow on my other blog I will write about Another Source of Income 4.... learn more on Tuesday, July 24, 2018 around 5 pm.

This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.

See my website for stocks followed and investment notes. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter or StockTwits. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.

Atlantic Power Corp

Sound bite for Twitter and StockTwits is: Utility Stock. This stock is probably relatively cheap. However, it is cheap for a reason and is of relatively high risk. On the other hand, insiders are buying and this might be a good sign that they expect the company to do better in the future. See my spreadsheet on Atlantic Power Corp.

I do not own this stock of Atlantic Power Corp (TSX-ATP, NYSE-AT). Because I like utility companies and in 2010, I have read two columns that recommended this particular utility company (TSX-ATP), I decided to investigate it. After investigating this stock, my impression is that I would not touch it with a barge-pole. However, I will talk about it and upload my spreadsheet so that you can decide for yourself. This company has recently converted from an income trust to a corporation. This company was in the TSX Utility Index. (Perhaps this is why it is recommended?)

When I was updating my spreadsheet, I noticed that insiders are buying shares. The chairman significantly increased his holdings by just under1,500%. The value of his shares went from around $83,000 to $1.2M. the company has a negative book value and this is never good.

They were having trouble with earnings so they cut their dividend in 2016. Analyst do not expect any positive earnings over the next couple of years and also no dividends over this period. They cannot afford to pay dividends.

The Liquidity Ratio is low but this often occurs with utilities. They count on cash flow to properly cover current liabilities. However, with this company, even with cash flow the Liquidity Ratio is low. For 2017 the Liquidity Ratio was 1.27. with a 5 year median of also 1.27. The Liquidity Ratio with cash flow after dividends is still low at 1.44 with a 5 year median of 2.10. I prefer this ratio be 1.50 or higher.

The Debt Ratio at 1.20 for 2017 is low as is the 5 year median ratio at 1.34. I prefer these to be 1.50 or better also. The Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios cannot be calculated as the book value is negative.

The Total Return per year is show below for years of 5 to 14. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See charts below.

As you can see by the charts below, shareholders have not make much in the way of money on this company.

The following is CDN$ Statistics

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	0.00%	-21.15%	-23.39%	2.24%
10	0.00%	-2.02%	-11.98%	9.96%
14	0.00%	3.25%	-8.26%	11.51%

The following is US$ Statistics

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	0.00%	-25.11%	-27.12%	2.01%
10	0.00%	-3.80%	-13.97%	10.17%
14	0.00%	-1.51%	-11.46%	9.95%

The 5 year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are -2.70, -3.03 and -3.36. the corresponding 10 year ratios are -7.82, -8.91 and -10.67. The historical ones are -10.95, -1.89 and -15.90. The current P/E Ratio is -16.88 based on a stock price of $2.87 and 2018 EPS estimate of -$0.22 CDN$ (-$0.17 US$). You cannot do a P/E Ratio test with negative value.

I get a Graham Price of $2.12. The 10 year low, median, and high median Price/Graham Price Ratios are 0.85, 0.98 and 1.14. The current P/GP Ratio is 1.36 based on a stock price of $2.87 CDN$. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

I get a 10 year median Price/Book Value per Share of 1.64 CDN$. The current P/B Ratio is -72.32 based on Book Value of -$16.7M CDN$, Book Value per Share of -$0.15 and a stock price of $2.87 CDN$. You cannot do stock price testing with a negative Book Value.

I get an historical median dividend yield of $8.60 CDN$. There are currently no dividends being paid, so I cannot do any stock price testing with no dividends.

The 10 year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 0.96 CDN$ and 1.26 US$. The difference is cause by the currency exchange rates varying. Since this company reports on US$, I will use US$ in this test. The 10 year median closing P/S Ratio is 1.26. The current P/S Ratio is 0.77 based on 2018 Revenue of $317M US$, Revenue per Share of $2.81 US$, and a stock price of $2.15 US$. This stock price testing suggests that the stock is relatively cheap.

I think that the last test on P/S Ratio is the only really good test. It is the only test I can do properly. The Graham Price test is not good because of negative earnings, AFFO and book values.

When I look at analysts’ recommendations I find Hold (2) and Underperform (2) recommendations. The consensus would be a Hold. The 12 month stock price is $4.19 CDN$ ($3.19 US$). This implies a total return of 46.02 and all in capital gains.

Marguerite Chambers on What’s on Thorold talks about institutional buying and selling of this stock. Matt Smith of Motley Fool has a rather negative view of this company. See what analysts are saying about this company on Stock Chase. Analysts seem negative about this company also.

Atlantic Power Corp is an independent electric power producer company that owns and operates a diverse fleet of power generation assets in the United States and Canada. Its web site is here Atlantic Power Corp.

The last stock I wrote about was about was Artis REIT (TSX-AX.UN, OTC-ARESF) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be Obsidian Energy Ltd TSX-OBE, NYSE-OBE) ... learn more on Monday, July 23, 2018 around 5 pm.

This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.

See my website for stocks followed and investment notes. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter or StockTwits. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.

Artis REIT

Sound bite for Twitter and StockTwits is: . My stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable. I would worry about their debt vulnerability. See my spreadsheet on Artis REIT.

I do not own this stock of Artis REIT (TSX-AX.UN, OTC-ARESF). Early in 2013, this company was mentioned as a good REIT to own. A number of people I correspond with mentioned this REIT. However, my first view of it is not positive. It is also not a dividend growth stock.

When I was updating my spreadsheet, I noticed that the Liquidity Ratio is very low. For 2017 it is 0.21. If this ratio is not 1.00 or above, it means that current assets cannot cover current liabilities. It only gets to be a good ratio 1.85 when you exclude from current liabilities their current debt. They are having no trouble currently rollover their debt, but things can change in a recession. This is a vulnerability.

There has been really no growth in dividends. There was a 40% increase in the second year of dividends which was 2006. In 2008 and 2009 there were increases that were less than 2% and then nothing. On the other hand, the dividends or distributions yield is high. The current yield is 8.27%. The 5, 10 and historical median distribution yields are 7.82%, 8.28% and 7.82%.

Since this is a Real Estate Investment Trust you generally look at Funds from Operations (FFO) and Adjusted Funds from Operations (AFFO) to decide if the company can afford their distributions. The FFO Dividend Payout Ratio is good with the one for 2017 at 75.5% and 5 year coverage at 74.0%.

Their long term debt is increasing. The Long Term Debt/Market Cap Ratio for 2017 was 0.56 but Long Term Debt has gone up since then another 32% and currently this ratio is 0.76. The ratio is still fine but it is climbing. I discussed my concerns with their Liquidity Ratios above. Their Debt Ratio at 2.00 and 5 year median at 1.97 are good ratios. For a utility the Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios are good at 2.00 and 1.00 for 2017 and 5 year median at 2.14 and 1.14.

The Total Return per year is show below for years of 5 to 13. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See charts below.

For those who bought this stock at the beginning, they have done well. However, lately the total returns are low.

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	0.00%	5.13%	-2.05%	7.18%
10	0.28%	6.69%	-0.66%	7.35%
13	3.13%	18.92%	6.59%	12.33%

The 5 year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are 10.40, 11.35 and 12.30. The 10 year corresponding ratios are 3.85, 4.30 and 4.75. The historical ratios are -2.01, -3.10 and -3.59. the problem is that the company has had so many years of earnings losses. The current P/E Ratio is 10.53 based on a stock price of $13.06 and 2018 EPS estimate of $1.24. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

For REITs Price/FFO Ratio test is probably a better one. The 5 year low, median, and high median P/FFO Ratios are 8.48, 9.27 and 10.59. The 10 year corresponding Ratios are 8.73, 9.80 and 11.06. The current P/FFO Ratio is 9.47 based on a stock price of $13.06 and 2018 FFO estimate of $1.38. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and around the median.

I get a Graham Price of $20.81. The 10 year low, median, and high median Price/Graham Price Ratios are 0.61, 0.69 and 0.76. The current P/GP Ratio is 0.63 based on a stock price of $13.06. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

I get a 10 year median Price/Book Value per Share of 0.89. The current P/B Ratio is 0.84 based on Book Value of $2,386M, Book Value per Share of $15.52 and a stock price of $13.06. The current P/B Ratio is some 5% below the 10 year ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

I get an historical median dividend yield of 8.27%. The historical median dividend yield is 7.82% based on dividends of $1.08 and a stock price of $13.06. The current yield is some 5.8% above the historical median. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

The 10 year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 3.77. The current P/S Ratio is 3.84 based on Revenue estimate for 2018 of $523M, Revenue per Share of $3.40 and a stock price of $13.06. The current P/S Ratio is some 1.9% above the 10 year median. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable but a bit above the median.

When I look at analysts’ recommendations I find Buy (1), Hold (9) and Underperform (1). The consensus would be a Hold recommendation. The 12 month stock price consensus is $13.88. This implies a total return of 14.55% with 8.28% from capital gains and 8.27% from distributions.

Haris Anwar of Motley Fool thinks Artis REIT is a high yielding and low risk REIT. Jacqueline McKee on Hillary HQ talks about a big fall in short selling interest for this company. See what analysts are saying about this stock on Stock Chase. Analysts talk about its heavy exposure to Alberta and about the fact that they are increasing their US exposure.

Artis Real Estate Investment Trust is a closed-end REIT based in Canada. The company's portfolio comprises of properties primarily divided into office retail and industrial in Central and Western Canada and select markets throughout the United States. Its web site is here Artis REIT.

The last stock I wrote about was about was TMX Group Ltd (TSX-X, OTC-TMXXF) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be Atlantic Power Corp (TSX-ATP, NYSE-AT) ... learn more on Friday, July 20, 2018 around 5 pm. Tomorrow on my other blog I will write about Another Source of Income 3.... learn more on Thursday, July 19, 2018 around 5 pm.

This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.

See my website for stocks followed and investment notes. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter or StockTwits. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.

TMX Group Ltd

Sound bite for Twitter and StockTwits is: Dividend Growth Financial. I think that the stock price tests that count are the P/B Ratio, P/S Ratio, and the Dividend yield. Two of these shows that the stock is expensive and one shows it is above the median. Also, the low Liquidity Ratio gives it a vulnerability. See my spreadsheet on TMX Group Ltd.

I do not own this stock of TMX Group Ltd (TSX-X, OTC-TMXXF). I looked at this stock in 2008 after I found it on a list of Strongest Dividend Growth stocks. I am interested in such stocks. However, this has not turned out not to be a strong dividend growth stock after all.

When I was updating my spreadsheet, I noticed that insiders have few if any shares even though they have stock options and rights. For example, both the CEO and Chairman have hold no shares. The Net Insider Selling is at 0.06%. This is high, but it seems that insiders are not taking up their options in shares.

The dividend yield is moderate with the current dividend at 2.70%. The 5, 10 and historical median dividend yields are 3.04%, 3.44% and 3.18% respectively. While there was some very high dividend growth in the beginning, between 2008 and 2013 inclusive there were no dividend increases.

As you can see from the chart below there has not been much dividend growth lately. However, the last increase was in 2018 and it was for 16%. For 2017 there was also a good dividend increase for 11%. Analysts expect the company to also raise dividends in 2019, but at a lower rate of 4.3%.

Currently they can afford their dividends. For 2017 the Dividend Payout Ratio was 30% with 5 year coverage at 63%. However, in 2016 DPR was 46% with 5 year coverage at 107%. Analysts expect that the company will have lower earnings next year and have a DPR of around 45%. The problem is that their earnings have been all over the place. In such a situation the 5 year coverage is the most important figure.

The debt ratio that I do not like is the Liquidity Ratio. This is an important ratio because it looks at the coverage of current liabilities by current assets. The problem with a very low one is that in bad times a company can get into serious trouble with a low Liquidity Ratio. The Liquidity Ratio for 2017 is 0.97. That means that the current assets cannot cover the current liabilities. If you add in cash flow after dividends it only rises to 0.98. If you take off current debt it becomes just 1.02.

This means that the company is dependent on cash flows and being able to roll over current debt to pay for current liabilities. This makes this stock quite vulnerable. This is especially true because a lot of economists think that the next recession will hit companies that are vulnerable because of debt.

The Long Term Debt/Market Cap Ratio is 0.14 and this is a good ratio. The Debt Ratio rather low at 1.14 but financials tend to have low Debt Ratios. Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios for 2017 are high at 8.05 and 7.05 but here again financials tend to have rather high ratios.

The Total Return per year is show below for years of 5 to 15. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See charts below.

Depending on when this stock has been bought, it would seem shareholders can get a good Total Return. The Total Return has been inconsistent and has most items for this stock.

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	4.04%	9.69%	6.79%	2.90%
10	2.52%	5.62%	2.92%	2.69%
15	13.05%	21.42%	13.42%	7.99%

The 5 year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are 10.09, 15.18 and 20.27. The corresponding 10 year ratios are 11.09, 15.12 and 20.68. The corresponding historical ratios are 15.35. 21.41 and 25.02. The current P/E Ratio is 17.44 based on a stock price of $85.98 and 2018 EPS estimate of $4.93. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable but above the median.

I get a Graham Price of $81.02. The 10 year low, median, and high median Price/Graham Price Ratios are 0.97, 1.19 and 1.31. The current P/GP Ratio is 1.06 based on a stock price of $85.98. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

I get a 10 year median Price/Book Value per Share of 1.14. The current P/B Ratio is 1.45 based on Book Value of $3,285M, Book Value per Share of $59.18 and a stock price of $85.98. A problem here is that the book value has only gained some 1.9% per year over the past 5 years and this is very low and not a good development. The current P/B Ratio is some 27% above the 10 year median. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

I get an historical median dividend yield of 3.18%. The current dividend yield is 2.70% based on dividends of $2.32 and a stock price of $85.98. The current dividend yield is 15% below the historical dividend yield. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable but above the median.

The 10 year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 4.52. The current P/S Ratio is 5.83 based on 2018 Revenue estimate of $818M, Revenue per Share of $14.74 and a stock price of $85.98. The current ratio is some 29% higher than the 10 year median. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

When I look at analysts’ recommendations I find Buy (3) and Hold (3). The consensus would be a Buy. The 12 month stock price is $87.00. This implies a total return of 3.88% with 1.19% from capital gains and 2.70% from dividends. This implied total return suggests that the stock price is relatively high.

You can see trading statistics for June 2018 for this group on News Wire. Ambrose O'Callaghan on Motley Fool thinks that now may not be a good time to buy the stock as it has hit an all-time high. See what analysts are saying about this stock on Stock Chase. Most analysts, except one, things that the stock is undervalued. There is one analyst that believes stock price is excessive.

TMX Group Ltd is engaged in the financial services domain. The company operates cash and derivatives markets for equities and fixed income. Most of its revenue is in the form of trading and clearing fees. Its web site is here TMX Group Ltd.

The last stock I wrote about was about was Inter Pipeline Ltd (TSX-IPL, OTC-IPPLF) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be Artis REIT (TSX-AX.UN, OTC-ARESF) ... learn more on Wednesday, July 18, 2018 around 5 pm. Tomorrow on my other blog I will write about Another Source of Income 2.... learn more on Tuesday, July 17, 2018 around 5 pm.

This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.

See my website for stocks followed and investment notes. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter or StockTwits. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.

Inter Pipeline Ltd

Sound bite for Twitter and StockTwits is: Dividend Growth Utility. In testing the stock price, it is coming up relatively reasonable and below the median. So, this is a relatively good price. See my spreadsheet on Inter Pipeline Ltd.

I do not own this stock of Inter Pipeline Ltd (TSX-IPL, OTC-IPPLF). In 2008, a friend had asked me about this pipeline and I had no information on it, so I investigated it. It is a utility and I follow lots of utility stocks. They used to be a Limited Partnership and they changed to a corporation in 2013.

What I noticed on the spreadsheet was their very low Liquidity Ratio. The one for 2017 was 0.16. when this ratio is less than 1.00, it means that current assets cannot cover current liability. Even including cash flow after to dividends you only get to 0.37. To get above 1.00 you have to add back in the current portion of the long term debt and you get 1.62. If they cannot roll over debt they will have problems.

Whether or not this will happen is anyone guess. It may not be likely, but it is a vulnerability. It is a continuing problem. The 5 and 10 year median Liquidity Ratio are about the same at 0.15.

They started to pay dividends in 1996 and have increased them every year but for three years. They have increase the dividend every year for the past 8 years. The dividend yields have been quite high and with a low dividend growth until recently.

The current dividend yield is 6.64%. The 5, 10 and historical median dividend yields are 5.28%, 6.00% and 8.70%. The dividends have grown by 9.13% per year over the past 5 years. Before that the dividend growth was below 7% per year. The last dividend increase was this year and it was for 3.7%.

They cannot afford their dividends in testing it the normal way against EPS. The Dividend Payout Ratio for 2017 is 115% with 5 year coverage at 148%. The DPR Ratio for CFPS for 2017 was 62% with 5 year coverage at 38%. It is preferable that dividends that this ratio be 40% for less.

On the other hand, this stock has a dividend reinvestment plan, so that they do not pay all the dividends in cash but pay a portion with new shares. In 2017 they paid out 57% of Net Income in Dividends with 5 year coverage at 85%. The dividend reinvestment plan also causes a constant increase in the number of shares outstanding.

As pointed out above, I do not like the Liquidity Ratios on this stock, but the other debt ratios are fair to good. The Long Term Debt/Market Cap Ratio is at 0.40. The Debt Ratio for 2017 is 1.50 with a 5 year median at 1.50 also. The Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios are 2.99 and 1.99 respectively for 2017. The 5 year median ratios are 3.29 and 2.29 respectively.

The Total Return per year is show below for years of 5 to 20. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See charts below.

Until recently, the Total Return for shareholders was quite nice. The 5 year Total Return is 7.8% per year, just under the 8% I like to see.

Years	Div. Gth	Tot Ret	Cap Gain	Div.
5	9.13%	7.83%	2.07%	5.76%
10	6.82%	18.32%	10.62%	7.70%
15	5.98%	18.84%	10.04%	8.80%
20	4.01%	10.73%	4.90%	5.84%

The 5 year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are 15.85, 18.72 and 22.78. The corresponding 10 year ratios are 14.90, 17.86 and 20.50. The corresponding historical P/E Ratios are 15.13, 18.51 and 21.08. The current P/E Ratio is 16.75 based on a stock price of $25.29 and 2018 EPS estimate of $1.51. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

I get a Graham Price of $17.81. The 10 year low, median, and high median Price/Graham Price Ratios are 1.31, 1.55 and 1.82. The current P/GP Ratio is 1.42 based on a stock price of $25.29. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

I get a 10 year median Price/Book Value per Share of 2.98. The current P/B Ratio is 2.71 based on a stock price of $25.29 and Book Value of $3,576M and Book Value per Share of $9.33. The current P/B Ratio is some 9% below the 10 year ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

I get an historical median dividend yield of 8.70%. The 5 and 10 year median yields are lower at 5.28% and 6.00%. The current dividend yield is 6.64% based on dividends of $1.68 and a stock price of $25.29. The current dividend is some 24% below the historical median dividend yield. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive.

This company used to be a Limited Partnership prior to 2013. As a Limited Partnership, dividend yields would have been high. If we compare the current yield of 6.64% to the 10 year median of 6.00%, the current yield is 10% higher. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

The 10 year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 4.59. the current P/S Ratio is 4.07 based on 2018 Revenue estimate of $2382M, Revenue per Share of $6.22 and a stock price of $25.29. The current P/S Ratio is some 11% lower than the 10 year median ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively reasonable and below the median.

When I look at analysts’ recommendations I find Strong Buy (2), Buy (6), Hold (6) and Underperform (1). The consensus would be a Buy. The 12 month stock price $28.93. This implies a total return of 21.04% with 14.39% from capital gains and 6.64% from Dividends.

Gemma Cottrell on Fairfield Current talks about recent analysts recommendations. Matt Smith on Motley Fool says that buying this stock will give you a juicy dividend while you wait for the stock price to recover. Michael Z. Yu has a positive report on this stock on Seeking Alpha. See what analysts are saying about this stock on Stock Chase .

Inter Pipeline Ltd is a petroleum transportation, storage and natural gas liquids extraction company based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. It owns and operates a diversified combination of energy infrastructure assets in western Canada and Europe. Its web site is here Inter Pipeline Ltd.

The last stock I wrote about was about was Morneau Shepell Inc. (TSX-MSI, OTC-MSIXF) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be TMX Group Ltd (TSX-X, OTC-TMXXF) ... learn more on Monday July 16, 2018 around 5 pm.

This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.

See my website for stocks followed and investment notes. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter or StockTwits. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.