Is it a good company at a reasonable price? It might be a turnaround stock situation, but I would be leery of buying a stock that has a negative book value. Another problem is that my testing is showing that it is relatively expensive. The company is off its recent high, but it is still testing as relatively expensive. Personally, I would not currently be interested in this stock.
I do not own this stock of Bombardier Inc (TSX-BBD.B, OTC-BDRBF). The buying of this stock was part of my early foray into industrial stocks in 1987. Up until 2001, I was making some 35% return per annum on this stock. When the stock first dropped in 2002, I had still made some 28% return per annum on this stock. Even by the lowest point in 2005, I had made some 13% per annum on this stock. By that time, it seemed to be turning itself around, so I did not sell. I lost hope by 2017, so I sold. I made 11.08% per year.
When I was updating my spreadsheet, I noticed that this stock price is up some 81% this year. This is a big leap. Also, some of the officer sold stock last year after the stock sky rocked. You have to wonder why?
If you had invested in this company in December 2015, for $1,005.00 you would have bought 30 shares at $33.50 per share. In December 2025, after 10 years you would have received $0.00 in dividends. The stock would be worth $7,005.00. Your total return would have been $7,005.00. This would be a total return of 21.43% per year with 21.43% from capital gain and 0.00% from dividends.
| Cost | Tot. Cost | Shares | Years | Dividends | Stock Val | Tot Ret |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $33.50 | $1,005.00 | 30 | 10 | $0.00 | $7,005.00 | $7,005.00 |
This company does not currently have dividends. So, no discussion on dividends and Dividend Payout Ratios (DPR).
Debt Ratios are awful with a negative book value. The Long Term Debt/Market Cap Ratio for 2025 is good at 0.27 and currently at 0.27. The Liquidity Ratio for 2025 is too low at 1.11 and 1.11 currently. If you added in Cash Flow after dividends, the ratios still too low at 1.31 and currently at 1.30. I prefer this ratio to be 1.50 or higher. The Debt Ratio for 2025 is awful at 0.94 and 0.94 currently. This company has a negative book value. The Leverage and Debt/Equity Ratios for 2025 are non-calculable due to a negative book value.
| Type | Year End | Ratio Curr |
|---|---|---|
| Lg Term R | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| Intang/GW | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Liquidity | 1.11 | 1.11 |
| Liq. + CF | 1.31 | 1.30 |
| Debt Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Leverage | -15.26 | -15.26 |
| D/E Ratio | -16.26 | -16.26 |
The Total Return per year is shown below for years of 5 to 39 to the end of 2025 in CDN$. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See chart below.
| From | Years | Div. Gth | Tot Ret | Cap Gain | Div. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5 | 0.00% | 81.06% | 81.06% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 10 | 0.00% | 21.43% | 21.43% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 15 | 0.00% | 3.78% | 3.32% | 0.46% |
| 2005 | 20 | 0.00% | 6.73% | 5.88% | 0.85% |
| 2000 | 25 | 0.00% | -3.55% | -3.79% | 0.24% |
| 1995 | 30 | 0.00% | 3.06% | 2.13% | 0.94% |
| 1990 | 35 | 0.00% | 9.50% | 6.64% | 2.86% |
| 1987 | 39 | 0.00% | 11.50% | 7.74% | 3.76% |
The Total Return per year is shown below for years of 5 to 36 to the end of 2025 in US$. Under the Capital Gain column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to capital gains. Under the Dividend column is the portion of the Total Return attributable to dividends. See chart below.
| From | Years | Div. Gth | Tot Ret | Cap Gain | Div. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5 | 0.00% | 78.04% | 78.04% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 10 | 0.00% | 21.62% | 21.62% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 15 | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.18% | 0.45% |
| 2005 | 20 | 0.00% | 5.87% | 4.91% | 0.96% |
| 2000 | 25 | 0.00% | -3.16% | -3.46% | 0.30% |
| 1995 | 30 | 0.00% | 3.11% | 2.13% | 0.99% |
| 1990 | 35 | 0.00% | 8.66% | 6.13% | 2.53% |
| 1989 | 36 | 0.00% | 8.61% | 6.10% | 2.51% |
The 5-year low, median, and high median Price/Earnings per Share Ratios are 6.14, 10.22 and 13.16. The corresponding 10 year ratios are negative and unusable. The corresponding historical ratios are 9.23, 12.86 and 16.23. The current ratio is 22.46 based on a stock price of $244.34 and EPS estimate for 2026 of $10.88 ($7.93 US$). This ratio is above the high ratio of both the 5 year ratios and historical ratios. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive. (Note that 22.46 is a rather high P/E Ratio.)
I also have Adjusted Earnings per Share (AEPS) data. The 5-year low, median, and high median Price/Adjusted Earnings per Share Ratios are 7.23, 11.18, 15.86. The corresponding 10 year ratios are 6.86, 11.04 and 14.77. The corresponding historical ratios are 7.13, 11.52 and 15.09. The current ratio is 22.52 based on a stock price of $179.50 and AEPS estimate for 2026 of $7.97. This ratio is above the high ratio of the 10 year 5 year ratios. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive. This testing is in US$ and you will get similar results in CDN$.
I cannot calculate a Graham Price because the book value is negative. A negative book value is never a good sign.
I cannot do a Price/Book Value per Share Ratio test because the Book Value is negative.
I get a 10-year median Price/Cash Flow per Share Ratio of 7.54. The current ratio is 15.06 based on Cash Flow per Share estimate for 2026 of $11.92, Cash Flow of $1,181M and a stock price of $179.50. The current ratio is 100% above the 10 year median ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive. This testing is in US$ and you will get similar results in CDN$.
I cannot do any dividend yield testing because this stock has no dividends.
The 10-year median Price/Sales (Revenue) Ratio is 0.39. The current P/S Ratio is 1.75 based on Revenue estimate for 2026 of $10,144M, Revenue per Share of $102.36 and a stock price of $179.50. The current ratio is 349% above the 10 year median ratio. This stock price testing suggests that the stock price is relatively expensive. This testing is in US$ and you will get similar results in CDN$.
Results of stock price testing is that the stock price is probably expensive. What tests I can do tell me the price is relatively expensive. An important one is the P/S Ratio test and it says that the stock price is relatively expensive. A number of tests I cannot do and that is never a good sign.
When I look at analysts’ recommendations, I find Strong Buy (3), Buy (3), Hold (7) and Sell (1). The consensus would be a Buy. The 12 month stock price consensus is $275.49 ($200.85 US$), with a high of $307.87 ($223.00 US$) and low of $206.91 ($150.85 US$). The consensus stock price $275.49 implies a total return of $12.75 based on a current stock price of $244.34.
Analysts so far on Stock Chase give this stock two Holds and a Buy for 2026. Amy Legate-Wolfe on Motley Fool says this company would thrive if the Loonie weakens. Chris MacDonald on Motley Fool says that if you a patient, this is a good turnaround stock to buy. The company put out a Press Release about their successful turnaround and their fourth quarter results for 2025.
Simply Wall Street via Yahoo Finance says this stock is overvalued and its fair value is only $47.40. Simply Wall Street has three warnings of interest payments are not well covered by earnings; negative shareholders’ equity; and significant insider selling over the past 3 months.
Bombardier designs, manufactures, markets, and provides parts and maintenance for its large, long-range Global and medium-to-large Challenger families of business jets. Most of the company's revenue is generated in North America, 60% of which is from customers in the US. It also has operations in Europe, North America, Asia-Pacific, and other markets. Its web site is here Bombardier Inc.
The last stock I wrote about was about was Manulife Financial Corp (TSX-MFC, NYSE-MFC) ... learn more. The next stock I will write about will be RioCan Real Estate (TSX-REI.UN, OTC-RIOCF) ... learn more on Friday, March 20, 2026 around 5 pm. Tomorrow on my other blog I will write about The Frugal Dividend portfolio.... learn more on Thursday, March 19, 2026 around 5 pm.
This blog is meant for educational purposes only and is not to provide investment advice. I am not a licensed professional investment advisor. Before making any investment decision, you should always do your own research or consult an investment professional. I do research for my own edification and I am willing to share. I write what I think and I may or may not be correct.
See my site for an index to these blog entries and for stocks followed. I have three blogs. The first talks only about specific stocks and is called Investment Talk. The second one contains information on mostly investing and is called Investing Economics Mostly. My last blog is for my book reviews and it is called Non-Fiction Mostly. Follow me on Twitter. I am on Instagram. Or you can just Google #walktoronto spbrunner8166 to see my pictures.